Billingsgate Market 1876 [Wikimedia]
Friday 7th April 1916: The County Appeals Tribunal
held yesterday at Luton had to deal with a confusing case in which the papers
of two brothers from Leighton Buzzard had become mixed. One of the brothers is
married and the other single, but the Tribunal had some difficulty establishing
which of them was which. After efforts were made by the applicant and his
solicitor to establish his identity, the Tribunal agreed that the man whose
appeal against military service they were considering was 24 years old, single and
partly responsible for the support of another, younger brother and a sister. At
the Local Tribunal his brother had been given four months’ exemption, but his
own application had been dismissed.
The applicant said that he and his brother had
two shops, a fish and game shop which they managed between them, and a fruit
shop in another part of the town which was managed by their sister and had been
started so that she could help to support herself. Three of their employees had
left and enlisted, and although they had tried to find replacements they had been
unable to do so; it was stated that if the applicant was not exempted the
business would have to close. He acted as salesmen and delivered country orders
on a motorcycle, while his brother attended Billingsgate market three times a
week – the Tribunal were told this was absolutely necessary as “if you want
good stuff you must go and choose it yourself, or you have anything palmed off
on you”. However, a member of the Tribunal pointed out that many retail
dealers, with considerably larger businesses, ordered their goods by telegraph.
It was also suggested that if the applicant’s younger brother was employed by
the business he could take over the motor cycle deliveries. The appeal was
refused on the grounds that one of the brothers must go, and the applicant
appeared the most suitable.
Source: Leighton Buzzard
Observer, 7th April 1916
No comments:
Post a Comment