Two charabanc parties in Waller Street, Luton c.1920 [Z1306/75/10/60/5]
Monday
24th January 1916: A meeting of Luton trades unionists was held
at the Winter Assembly Hall in Waller Street last night to discuss the possibility
of conscription and other issues related to the war. The meeting was called by
the Luton Trades and Labour Council to decide how they should vote at the
Trades Union Congress to be held at Bristol. A vote was taken at which it was
decided by the narrowest of margins that the delegate should vote against conscription.
The resolution passed was:
“That this conference of the Labour Party declares itself in opposition to any form of compulsory service for war purposes, believing that its incidence would bear unevenly upon the people; and further calls upon the Labour Praty in the House of Commons to resist to the last any and every attempt to fasten upon the nation a system of conscription which in practice has been a deadly foe to the organised workers of Europe for generations.”
The proposer of the
resolution, Mr. Murray Janes, argued for the association of the voluntary
system with national liberty, and also maintained that conscription was not
necessary. His seconder declared that it would be used by the upper classes to
forcibly restrict workers and that the incompetence of those in command meant
those conscripted would simply be cannon fodder. Speaking against the
resolution and in favour of conscription Mr. J. Mabley pointed out that Lord
Kitchener believed it was absolutely necessary, and that it would be unfair to
married men who had enlisted with a guarantee that single men would be sent
first. Even if conscription proved the thin end of the wedge it was better than
being ruled by Germany. His statement that “if the country was fit to live in
it was worth fighting for” drew applause from the audience. Further arguments
were put forward that supporting the Bill would help to bring “this detestable
war” to an end, and that the Munitions Act had already led to what was effectively
conscription of workers who were forced to stay in their place of employment unless
they received papers releasing them. Despite these arguments against it the
resolution was passed by 92 votes to 91. A further resolution calling for “the
immediate repeal of the Munitions Act as being a gross interference with the rights
of the workers” was passed unanimously.
No comments:
Post a Comment